Porous TiNbZr alloy scaffolds for biomedical applications, studia, artykuły, porosity
[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
Acta Biomaterialia 5 (2009) 3616–3624
www.elsevier.com/locate/actabiomat
Porous TiNbZr alloy scaffolds for biomedical applications
Xiaojian Wang, Yuncang Li, Jianyu Xiong, Peter D. Hodgson, Cui’e Wen
*
Institute for Technology Research and Innovation, Deakin University, Geelong, Vic. 3217, Australia
Received 27 January 2009; received in revised form 31 May 2009; accepted 2 June 2009
Available online 6 June 2009
Abstract
In the present study, porous Ti–10Nb–10Zr alloy scaffolds with different porosities were successfully fabricated by a ‘‘space-holder”
sintering method. By the addition of biocompatible alloying elements the porous TiNbZr scaffolds achieved significantly higher strength
than unalloyed Ti scaffolds of the same porosity. In particular, the porous TiNbZr alloy with 59% porosity exhibited an elastic modulus
and plateau stress of 5.6 GPa and 137 MPa, respectively. The porous alloys exhibited excellent ductility during compression tests and the
deformation mechanism is mainly governed by bending and buckling of the struts. Cell cultures revealed that SaOS2 osteoblast-like cells
grew on the surface and inside the pores and showed good spreading. Cell viability for the porous scaffold was three times higher than the
solid counterpart. The present study has demonstrated that the porous TiNbZr alloy scaffolds are promising scaffold biomaterials for
bone tissue engineering by virtue of their appropriate mechanical properties, highly porous structure and excellent biocompatibility.
Crown Copyright 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd. on behalf of Acta Materialia Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Titanium alloy; Scaffold; Mechanical properties; Biocompatibility
1. Introduction
totyping
[10,11]
. Sintering a mixture of Ti powder and
space-holder particles (e.g. urea or ammonium hydrogen
carbonate) produced porous Ti with a porosity of 70%
which exhibited a plateau stress of 53 MPa and an elastic
modulus of 3.4 GPa
[6]
. However, the compressive strength
of porous Ti is still lower than that of cortical bone (180–
200 MPa)
[12]
. In order to achieve a porous scaffold com-
bined with high strength and high porosity, some porous
Ti alloy scaffolds were therefore developed
[13]
. A porous
Ti–6Al–4V alloy scaffold was reported to achieve higher
strength than unalloyed porous Ti at the same porosity
[9,13]
. However, research on the biological behaviour of
metals has shown that the composition of implant bioma-
terials must be carefully selected to avoid or minimize
adverse reactions
[14]
. The release of metal ions from some
metal materials, e.g. aluminium (Al), nickel (Ni), iron (Fe),
vanadium (V) and chromidium (Co), can generate adverse
biological effects
[14]
. On the other hand, titanium (Ti), zir-
conium (Zr), niobium (Nb) and tantalum (Ta) are believed
to be non-toxic metals with good biocompatibility
[15]
and
they are widely used in low modulus b or a/b Ti implant
materials
[16]
. Thus there is an increasing research interest
in developing porous Ti-based alloys using non-toxic
Porous materials are of significant importance for bone
tissue engineering applications, as they provide good bio-
logical fixation to the surrounding tissue through bone tis-
sue ingrowth into the porous network
[1]
. Although porous
ceramics and polymers have been studied as scaffold mate-
rials, they cannot meet the mechanical requirements for
load bearing conditions
[2–5]
. For this reason, porous Ti
and Ti alloys have been developed. The major benefits of
porous Ti and Ti alloys compared with other bone graft
materials include their good mechanical strength, with an
elastic modulus close to that of bone, porous structure,
providing biological fixation, and good biocompatibility
[6,7]
.
A number of approaches to the fabrication of porous Ti
and Ti alloys have been reported, including sintering loose
Ti powder or fibre
[8,9]
, slurry sintering
[10]
and rapid pro-
*
Corresponding author. Address: Institute for Technology Research
and Innovation, Deakin University, Pigdons Rd., Waurn Ponds, Geelong,
Vic. 3217, Australia. Tel.: +61 3 5227 3354; fax: +61 3 5227 1103.
E-mail address:
(C. Wen).
1742-7061/$ - see front matter Crown Copyright 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd. on behalf of Acta Materialia Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2009.06.002
X. Wang et al. / Acta Biomaterialia 5 (2009) 3616–3624
3617
alloying elements. New generation porous Ti-based alloy
scaffolds are expected to combine high mechanical strength
and good biocompatibility.
In the present study Ti–10Nb–10Zr was designed with
the addition of a b stabilizer of Nb and a stabilizer of Zr
[16]
. The TiNbZr alloy is expected to provide high yield
strength due to the addition of Nb and Zr, which ensure
a duplex microstructure of the a/b phase. The structure
and mechanical properties of the porous TiNbZr were
studied. Cell adhesion and proliferation of human osteo-
blast-like cells cultured on the porous alloy scaffolds were
assessed.
porous structure and overall pore volume. Scanning elec-
tron microscopy (SEM) combined with quantitative image
analyse using Image-Pro Plus (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Sil-
ver Spring, MD) software were used to characterize the
pore structure and pore size distribution. X-ray diffraction
(XRD) was used to characterize the phase constituents of
the porous alloys. Surface roughness was measured using
Surtronic 3+ Roughness checker.
2.2. Mechanical test and simulation
Cylindrical samples with a diameter of 10 mm and
length of 15 mm were used to examine the mechanical
properties. Five samples were tested for each condition.
The samples were cut by electrical discharge machining
(EDM), which ensures plane and parallel end faces of the
samples. Compression tests were carried out in a 30 kN
Instron, equipped with a non-contact extensometer (resolu-
tion 0.5 lm) and the initial strain rate was set at 10
3
s
1
.
Compression tests were also conducted on solid Ti–
10Nb–10Zr cylinder samples prepared by powder
metallurgy.
The elastic modulus and yield strength of porous TiN-
bZr from this study were compared with the predictions
of the Gibson–Ashby (G&A) model
[19]
and Finite Ele-
ment Method (FEM) model proposed by Roberts and Gar-
boczi
[20–22]
. In the Gibson–Ashby model the structure of
the porous material was simplified and it was assumed that
the open-cell foam consists of periodic arranged beams.
Bending of the beams dominated the deformation mecha-
nism. The relationships between plateau stress, elastic mod-
ulus and relative density are given by:
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Specimen preparation and characterization
The fabrication method of the porous TiNbZr alloy was
similar to that used in previous studies
[6,17,18]
. Elemental
metal powders of Ti (purity >99.7%, particle size <45 lm),
Nb (purity >99.8%, particle size <45 lm) and Zr (purity
>99.9%, particle size <45 lm) were weighed to give a nom-
inal composition of Ti–10Nb–10Zr (hereafter wt.%). The
powders were blended in a planetary ball milling system
with stainless steel containers and balls (PM400, Retsch)
for 4 h with a weight ratio of ball to powder of 1:2 and
rotation rate of 100 rpm. The blended TiNbZr powder
was mixed with ammonium hydrogen carbonate (NH
4
H-
CO
3
), which was used as the space-holder material. The
size of space-holder particles was selected to be 500–
800 lm. The mixture of Ti, Nb, Zr powder and NH
4
HCO
3
was cold pressed into green compacts in a 50 ton hydraulic
press and the green compacts were sintered in a vacuum of
10
4
–10
5
Torr in two steps. The first step was carried out
at 175 C for 2 h to burn out the space-holder particles. In
the second step the compacts were heated up to 1200 C
and held for 10 h. Porous TiNbZr alloys with porosities
of 42%, 50%, 59%, 69% and 74% were fabricated by adding
20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 wt.% ammonium hydrogen carbonate
to the powder mixture.
The general porosity of the porous alloys was calculated
by the formula
e
¼
1
q
q
s
E
=
E
s
¼
C
1
ð
q
=
q
s
Þ
n
1
ð
2
Þ
r
pl
=
r
ys
¼
C
2
ð
q
=
q
s
Þ
n
2
ð
3
Þ
100
ð
1
Þ
where E is the elastic modulus of the foam, E
s
is the elastic
modulus of the cell surface solid material, r
pl
is the pla-
teau stress of the porous material, r
ys
is the yield strength
of the cell surface solid material and C
1
, C
2
, n
1
and n
2
are
constants, depending on the cell structure. To date, the
complex dependence of C
1
, C
2
, n
1
and n
2
on structure is
not well understood. Experimental evidence suggests that
n
1
=2, n
2
= 1.5 for open-cell foams, C
1
is a constant of
1 for rigid polymers, elastomers, metals and glasses and
C
2
is a constant of 0.3 for cellular metals and polymers.
Elastic moduli of both open-cell and closed-cell foams
based on the FEM have been proposed by Roberts and
Garboczi
[20–22]
. The ‘‘Gaussian Random Filed” model
was used in the present study, as this model deals with
structures similar to the cellular structures of porous TiN-
bZr scaffolds. The FEM model is assumed to be a highly
irregular structure with curved struts of variable thickness.
Equations to fit the results of their simulations are:
where q and q
s
are the density of the porous alloy and its
corresponding theoretical density, respectively. The density
of the porous alloy was determined from its weight and
dimensional measurements. The theoretical density is
5.1 g cm
3
(based on the alloy composition of Ti–10Nb–
10Zr). The general pores inside the porous alloys consist
of two parts, interconnected pores (open pores) and closed
pores. The interconnectivity of the porous TiNbZr was
evaluated by measuring the weight of paran penetrating
into the porous structure when they were boiled in paran
in a vacuum chamber. The interconnectivity was calculated
by comparing the volume of para
n penetrating into the
E
=
E
s
¼
4
:
2
ð
q
=
q
s
Þ
3
:
15
for 0
:
05
<
q
ð
4
Þ
q
s
<
0
:
20
3618
X. Wang et al. / Acta Biomaterialia 5 (2009) 3616–3624
Eq.
(3)
describes the higher porosity data (relative density
<0.2). For lower porosity, where
q
q
s
> 0.20, the relationship
is:
2
:
15
q
=
q
s
0
:
029
0
:
971
E
=
E
s
¼
ð
5
Þ
2.3. MTT assay
Cell culture was performed on a solid TiNbZr alloy
sample and the porous TiNbZr alloy with a porosity of
69% in 12-well tissue culture plates. SaOS2 osteoblast-like
cells (10,000 per well) were seeded on the top surface of
the samples. The cells were cultured in minimum essential
media (MEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum,
1% non-essential amino acid, 10,000 U ml
1
penicillin,
10,000 lgml
1
streptomycin and 0.4% amphostat B at
37 C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO
2
and 95%
air. The media was changed every 3 days.
An MTT assay to measure cell viability and prolifera-
tion was used to quantitatively determine the number of
viable cells that had attached and grown on the samples.
After culture for 14 days the MTT solution was added
and incubated with the cells for 4 h. The cells were then
lysed to release and solubilize purple formazan. Colorimet-
ric analysis and comparison to a standard curve of known
viable cell numbers can be used to calculate viable cell
numbers for each condition. The MTT assay was con-
ducted on a two-dimensional tissue culture-treated surface
(2D Con), cell seeded metal discs (Disc) and the wells that
contained the discs (Well). Disc + Well refers to the sum of
the cell numbers of seeded discs and their respective wells.
n = 3 for all experimental groups. Significant differences in
the cell number were analysed using one-way ANOVA
(P < 0.05). Samples after cell culture for 14 days (n =2)
were fixed and then rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline,
dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, critical point dried
and examined by SEM.
Fig. 1. (a) Powder morphology of the blended TiNbZr powders. (b)
Backscattering image of porous TiNbZr alloy sintered at 1200 C for 10 h.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Sintering of porous TiNbZr alloy
Fig. 1
a shows the morphology of the blended Ti, Nb and
Zr powders. Pre-alloying did not occur during the blending
process, as a low energy ball milling process was adopted in
the present study. The morphology of the blended powder
is similar to that of the raw powders. The size of these pow-
ders is mainly in the range 5–45 lm. XRD showed that the
blended powder is a mixture of Ti, Nb and Zr powders, as
shown in
Fig. 2
. After burning off the space-holder parti-
cles the green compacts were then sintered at 1200 Cin
high vacuum.
A typical powder sintering process comprises three
stages: stage 1 – where the growth of the sintering bond
from initial loose powder occurs and the sintering neck
Fig. 2. XRD pattern of the blended powder mixture (a) and the sintered
porous TiNbZr (b).
X. Wang et al. / Acta Biomaterialia 5 (2009) 3616–3624
3619
forms; stage 2 – where pore rounding, densification and
grain growth occur simultaneously (densification in this
stage is accomplished by diffusion of the alloying elements,
grain boundary diffusion and growth); stage 3 – where den-
sification is slower than in stages 1 and 2. There are simul-
taneous grain coarsening events that impede densification
[23]
. In general, the densification rate increases with
decreasing particle size and increasing sintering tempera-
ture and time, where the particle size and sintering temper-
ature are much more ecient than the sintering time in
influencing the sintering rate
[23]
. It is shown that Nb
and Zr diffused into the Ti matrix leading to the formation
of a + b phases after sintering for 10 h. This was confirmed
by XRD, as shown in
Fig. 2
. As shown in
Fig. 1
b, there
were no obvious elemental Nb- and Zr-rich areas remain-
ing after sintering and the sintered porous TiNbZr alloy
consists of lamellar a and b phases.
3.2. Structure and pore distribution in porous TiNbZr alloys
Fig. 3
shows the morphologies of the porous TiNbZr
alloys with porosities ranging from 42% to 74%. The por-
ous alloys were prepared using the same space-holder par-
ticles. Statistical analysis of pore size reveals that the
porous TiNbZr alloy sintered using space-holder particles
of 500–800 lm gave pore sizes ranging from 300 to
800 lm, accounting for 52.4% of the total pores. Beside
macropores, there were also some micropores present on
the cell wall of the porous alloys (
Fig. 3
e). The size of the
micropores was in the range 5–20 lm. It is believed that
the presence of micropores is essential for porous scaffolds
to achieve osteoinduction
[6]
.
By adjusting the amount of space-holder particles the
porosity of the resulting porous TiNbZr alloy can be
altered. The interconnectivity of the porous alloy also
Fig. 3. Morphology of porous TiNbZr alloys with different porosities: (a) 42%; (b) 50%; (c) 59%; (d) 69%; (e) 74% and (f) Statistical analysis of pore size
distribution in (e).
3620
X. Wang et al. / Acta Biomaterialia 5 (2009) 3616–3624
Table 1
Summary of the mechanical properties of porous TiNbZr alloys as a function of porosity.
TiNbZr
Elastic modulus (GPa)
Plateau stress (MPa)
Interconnectivity (%) Ultimate stress (MPa) Elongation (%)
Solid TNZ
68 (3.5)
1438 (39)
a
N/A
1830 (30)
15.3 (0.5)
42% porosity
21 (0.3)
368 (5.5)
40
50% porosity
7.9 (0.7)
235 (4.6)
82
59% porosity
5.6 (0.3)
137 (2.3)
91
69% porosity
3.9 (0.3)
67 (2.3)
98
74% porosity
1.6 (0.2)
27 (1.5)
99
a
Yield stress; standard deviations are shown in parentheses.
increases with porosity. As shown in
Table 1
, the intercon-
nectivity was 40% for the sample with a total porosity of
42%, and the porous sample with a porosity >69% achieved
nearly full interconnectivity. The interconnectivity is very
important for porous biomaterials, as the connected pores
will allow cells to grow inside the material and body fluid to
circulate
[9]
. Thus, high porosity is preferable for porous
scaffold biomaterials. However, high porosity causes a
decrease in the mechanical properties of porous materials
[24]
, which will be discussed in the next section.
Ti. The compressive strengths of porous TiNbZr scaffolds
with porosities of 59% and 69% were 137 and 67 MPa,
while at the same porosity the compressive strengths for
porous pure Ti were 122 and 53 MPa, respectively
[6]
.
Fig. 5
shows the predicted elastic modulus (E)ofthe
porous TiNbZr alloy normalized to the elastic modulus
of the solid alloy (E
s
) as a function of the relative density
(q/q
s
). For comparison, the Gibson–Ashby and FEM mod-
els are also included. It can be seen that the experimental
data are better predicted by the FEM model than the Gib-
son–Ashby model in the whole range of relative densities.
The elastic modulus predicted by the FEM model is lower
than that predicted by the Gibson–Ashby model. It should
be noted that the FEM model deals with a highly irregular
structure with curved struts of variable thickness. Since the
elastic modulus of a porous structure is determined by the
thinnest struts, the mass in the thickest regions of the struts
contributes little to the overall elastic modulus. This has
the effect of reducing the elastic modulus of a porous struc-
ture for a given density, compared with models having
struts with a uniform cross-sectional area
[20]
. It is clear
that the experimental data in the present study are slightly
lower than the value predicted by the FEM model in the
higher porosity range (
Fig. 5
). It can deduced from this
3.3. Mechanical properties of porous TiNbZr alloys
The mechanical properties of porous TiNbZr alloys
were investigated by compression tests on cylindrical sam-
ples. The compressive stress–strain curves of the porous
TiNbZr alloys with porosities of 42–74% are shown in
Fig. 4
. The stress–strain curves are smooth, indicating
excellent ductility of the porous alloys during the compres-
sion test. The calculated elastic moduli and plateau stresses
(yield stresses) are shown in
Table 1
. The elastic modulus
and yield strength of dense TiNbZr (porosity 4%) were
68 GPa and 1438 MPa, respectively. The porous TiNbZr
alloy scaffold with a porosity of 59% exhibited an elastic
modulus and plateau stress of 5.6 GPa and 137 MPa,
respectively, which is close to the mechanical properties
of natural bone
[12]
. The plateau stress of the porous TiN-
bZr alloy was significantly higher than that of porous pure
Fig. 4. Compressive stress–strain curves for the porous TiNbZr alloy
scaffolds with various porosities from 42% to 74%.
Fig. 5. Elastic modulus (E) normalized to the solid metal elastic modulus
(E
s
) as a function of relative density for the porous TiNbZr alloys.
Predictions from the Gibson–Ashby model and Finite Element Method
(FEM) model of Roberts and Garboczi.
[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]